FORGET THE SUPER BOWL

The prez isn't the only one skipping the Super Bowl. I have no plans to touch the unclean thing. Do you?Bad Bunny and Green Day?  Seriously? Bad Bunny plans to wear a DRESS to support sexual perversion.

Not sure how much longer God will withhold his judgment, but the NFL has lost its way totally with inane messaging and supporting everything God hates. For years now, their half-time shows have been open sewers.  I just turned them off.  Now is the time to make this the lowest-rated Super Bowl in memory.

Americans need to simply vote with their remote. The sickos at the NFL will only listen if the money faucet dries up.

We are tired of the Dan Cathy's of the world compromising good companies and institutions (in his case Chick-fil-A) before the Baals of this world. If we do not stand now, WHEN? Can I get an "Amen?"

THE REAL BIG 2020 ELECTION LIE

 I was ordering a cheesesteak hoagie today and they had FOX on with the hearing with Jack Smith, and an angry Democrat, Ms. Kamlager-Dove (isn't it always the hyphenated ones?) kept declaring that the claim that the 2020 election was stolen was a big lie - again, and again, and again.  "Thou dost protest too much."  Lies stated often enough become the truth to those unable to critically think or to recognize the obvious.  The Dems and RINOs call it a lie ad infinitum because people still know in their gut that the election was indeed corrupt and almost certainly stolen, and they want to bombard and intimidate until their opposition is totally marginalized. 

The so-called origins science folks have done that with molecules-to-man evolution - they really do not care if anyone understands the hypothesis, they are simply satisfied when someone agrees to it being true. They roundly ignore all the issues with the hypothesis, including the fact that the human race would genetically become extinct within 500 generations, given the 100 changes per generation. The Bible puts the number at 200-300 generations so far and counting, while the 2.5-million-year human timeline by evolutionists would require close to 125,000 generations. They try to save their theory by saying genetic change did not occur until about 5,100 years ago, which much better aligns with human history. I have seen the graph, and all this is only one scintilla of all the evidence that works against the hypothesis (how did gender, sexuality, information, and optimally designed components with inate reproductive capabilities all arise in just the right placeswith just the right timing, and how, how, how?) Trump says he has come across massive evidence concerning the election to bolster his claims. Hopefully, enough remains that did not go the way of Hillary's emails to make his case. We need to see it. I have seen a lot, but I am sure there is much more. 

I reviewed detailed analyses by some very technical people, and I am personally positive that the election was indeed stolen. Any other explanation for the data defies reality and is suitable only for the most gullible. RINOs and Mike Pence, who were not fond of Trump, made pronouncements mimicking Dems with no evidence whatsoever. What Trump asked Pence to do was wholly legal and justified.

Of course, there are always those who bombastically claim otherwise, but I have seen zero evidence to back up their hyperbolic claims.  Here are just a few pieces of evidence:

1) The number of registered voters increased by 19% from 2008 to 2020. Yet Biden allegedly outperformed Barack Obama by 23% in terms of vote totals.  That 4% is quite telling in elections typically only won by half that margin. Joe Biden stayed in his basement, so to speak, while Obama drew large adoring crowds like Trump did twelve years later. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it almost always IS a duck!

2) Swing states illegally changed voting procedures using Covid as the all-encompassing excuse. Massive mail-in voting was allowed, which, by the way, was largely eliminated in Europe due to easy and pervasive fraud. U.S. Dems are not the only ones who cheat, but they have a near-monopoly on it here. Mass dumps into ballot boxes have been video-documented, and yet the over-confident Kamlager-Dove, immune to the obvious, soldiers on.  They also allowed votes to be counted past the deadlines - remember back in 1960 with Mayor Daley in Chicago, who famously asked, "How many more votes do we need?" I am aware of the largely uncontested analysis of how the late proven fraud in Illinois resulted in JFK rather than Nixon winning that state, but it was not enough to turn the national results. Seven swing states all magically ended up in the Biden column in 2020 by "just enough to win" margins, while all seven went to Trump in 2024, which defies even a fertile imagination.

3) Consistent 51-49 results including voting district tallies totally inconsistent with previous elections and 2024.  "Just enough to win." Counties that went for Trump in 2016 magically going for Biden like crazy.  Then in 2024, the results tracked back to agree with historical records. Amazing!

4) Vote counting halted in swing states with excuses to get rid of poll watchers. HVAC, plumbing leaks, and what not. I do not believe in multiple coincidences the SAME DAY. Do you?

5) Illegal counting by others through the night with massive ballot drops from insecure locations amazingly all for one candidate, some with repeatedly the same signatures. In Georgia, the person in charge quashed all opposition to what went on. That is on video and there is no alternative explanation for what happened.

6) Voting machines that "could not process" hundreds of times more votes that the established accuracy standard were then manually processed with one-sided results every time. In Georgia, those went over 95% for Biden in districts not given to that. Reminds me of Philly where John Kerry got 100% of the vote in some voting districts where opposition poll watchers were kicked out.

7) Biden barely campaigned, seemingly sure he was going to win (the fix was in). His strategy was not to go out there and stumble more than he had already.  We all saw the real Joe Biden in that pivotal debate in 2024. Stumbling was his way of life.

8) Court cases were dismissed based upon "lack of standing" which often seems misapplied when a court does not want to take up a case. NOT ONE to my knowledge ever dealt with any technical analysis.

9) Dominion rolled Fox for their claims on their involvement - yet the Venezuelan connection with Dominion and the way the machines were set in terms of rejections appears beyond anything accidental.

10) Alarmingly similar installment of the loser in both Brazil and Venezuela with a similar m.o.  New evidence on international players, including China, appear to have substantial evidence, but anyone interested in truth would desire we know for sure what happened so it never happens again.

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY

Over 40 years ago, back in 1985, my wife and I started a non-profit dedicated to breaking down barriers among people - racial, economic, educational, denominational, political, etc. This ministry is totally non-denominational and has published a lot of gospel literature and produced over 3,000 radio programs.  We have a black-white marriage, and there have actually been NINE interethnic marriages in our extended family - black, white, bi-racial, Hispanic, Asian, you name it.

Due to my passion for true unity, I was often the designated speaker at church on MLK Day. I honestly would have preferred it to have been called Civil Rights Day, as that is the nature of most Federal Holidays. Even George Washington, the Founder of our nation, and Abraham Lincoln, the one who preserved the Union, do not have a day with their name on it - only "Presidents Day".   Even Christmas and Easter are not named after the Lord who left heaven to come die for us and be raised up, do not accord that honor.  Only Columbus Day, which dates back to 1792, and MLK, Jr. Day remain.  Even then, only 20 states make Columbus Day a paid holiday, and many insist on trashing Columbus Day and celebrating Indigenous Peoples Day instead.  There is a lot of P.C. behind this, as well as a total glorification of those called Native Americans, often ignoring actual history, which indicates that they are no more sainted than any other people group. There was some pretty intense violence, massive intertribal warfare, and the like, flying in the face of the peace-pipe images.  I have nothing against honoring them as much as any other people group, as ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God. However, to demonize Columbus and deify Native Americans is simply a non-starter for me.

The move a few decades ago to practically deify MLK led me to stop doing those speeches.  For the last few, I only talked about civil rights and barely mentioned his name. However, pushing him to sainthood despite the increasing hard evidence he was not a saint at all, from the Testimony of Ralph Abernathy, his successor of the SCLC, confessions of others close to him, the note from Boston University concerning his doctorate degree at the King Center at Stanford University, which should have been revoked for gross and massive plagiarism. They asked what purpose that would serve, ignoring academic integrity. The evidence of chronic plagiarism throughout his life including the "I Have A Dream" speech came to light when his papers were donated by Coretta to Stanford in the 1980's. Perhaps he felt privileged as predominantly white Crozer Theological Seminary gave him an A- average while predominantly black Morehouse College gave him a C+.  Boston University continued the favored treatment.

Perhaps even more alarming to Christians was his extreme serial adultery, even on the day of his death. Women at his speeches would give him their number or a key to his room, and his confidantes said he did not refuse any. Ralph Abernathy and others confirmed the extent of unfaithfulness and it was alleged Coretta simply looked the other way.

I have been to the King Center in Memphis, but have studied documents from Stanford. It has always bothered me that Christian evangelicals often call him a prophet, though originally they opposed him. With the rise of Malcolm X, he seemed more palatable, so it was Christian P.C. to embrace him as a fellow believer with a call on his life. However, any honest reading of his academic papers indicates he was never born again, and in fact was an enemy of the true gospel, never having preached it his entire life.  He says he was baptized at six but had no clue what it was about, simply joining others. He became a skeptic as a child, and by the age of 13, determined that Jesus Christ was not God.  Any "divinity" was simply because Jesus was doing God's work. The virgin birth and much of scripture were not in his belief system at all, and the entirety of his theological education was at apostate institutions. He leaned on theologians who denied the central beliefs of Christianity, and seemed to have never seriously studied scripture, but cherry-picked passages that were consistent with his message and interpreted them to suit his agenda. Of course, that is called eisegesis, and he is far from alone in doing that. Whether the purveyors of health and wealth on TBN and similar networks, those pushing feminism, or liberation theologians in Nicaragua and elsewhere, eisegesis is a sure-fire path to deception. Only exegesis, which seeks to take from scripture the pure, obvious, and eternal meaning, will keep one on the straight and narrow path to eternal life.  I Peter 2 warns us about people who appeal to Christians, but who have an immoral character and other issues that we need to avoid.

I find that those who are partial, who look past the sins of those they admire, fall into manifest deceptions. That is so common today among so many that millions honor and respect, and MLK is not the slightest unique in that. The reason we point out the specifics today, though, is that we have a Federal holiday that honors him above all others, even those whose character dwarfs his. To be impartial is more than a notion, and we need to be 100% consistent in that if we are to please the Lord.

NAIVE CONSERVATIVE VOTERS

So many voters who are strong on moral issues are hopelessly naive when it comes to voting. Most will vote for president, a group in Pennsylvania notwithstanding, which urges Christians not to vote, arguing all are corrupt, using false equivalencies.   If those in the early church could vote, I believe they would have voted overwhelmingly against Nero, even if his opponent was quite far from perfect, but who at least looked out for them and chose people who were not overtly hostile to them.

This year, a woman who championed unrestrained access to ALL public school classrooms by the LGBTQetc folks with NO parental opt-out provision was elected governor of New Jersey with only 12% of the vote and about 20% total turnout!  A decent opponent who was far more qualified but the victim of an absurdly dishonest heavily financed campaign lost because so many stayed home. 

The existing Democratic AG, Matt Platkin, has been on a crusade against First Choice, a pregnancy center with a great record, doing a targeted and unconstitutional investigation making demands intended to destabilize them financially while of course leaving Planned Parenthood with endless admissions of illegal and immoral activity totally free to pursue their agenda.  Thankfully, the SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, but even if they win, time and resources are spent and those who could have brought about a change in leadership in New Jersey and the dastardly appointments they make.

This scenario has played out nationwide, especially in off-year elections. Radicals and leftist vote and often win, even in deep red areas, because naive and clueless voters sit home. The result? Leftist and immoral school boards nationwide. Local leaders who rise up to higher positions. And the worst, perhaps? Mamdani, a communist Jew-hating man quite in tune with Hamas won the mayoralty race in New York City - while the turnout in NYC was over double percentage -wise that of NJ, he could EASILY have been defeated if (1) a decent alternative candidate had been chosen, and (2) those who understood the evil would have gone to the polls.

Apathy ruled. Too many listened to bogus charges against opponents or failed to weigh the differences between deeply flawed candidates.  When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?

CHARLIE KIRK

Many were saddened by this assassination last week. I listened to him occasionally and note he was a very intense person. Some can take that, some cannot. He loved to debate and would take all comers, especially in university settings. This is in huge contrast to the way academics approach things - they think many issues are beyond debate and settled. Actually, if they get drawn into a debate, they often lose because they never have to defend what they believe, while Charlie had to defend this beliefs almost every time he opened his mouth.

I think about evolution, homosexual "marriage," transgenderism, man-made climate change, and an alleged "climate emergency." Those are axiomatic in most academic settings, with most considered true even in self-identified Christian institutions. I debate people online who repeat these fallible and in many cases extremely unscientific ideas ad nauseum. The big one these days on Academia is that Christians are against the environment because they do not abandon the word of God to bow at the altar of ecological religion. They detest the dominion God gave man over the earth and the concept that God is sovereign over EVERYTHING including the state of earth.

I am on X, and the sheer hatred against Kirk by professors, medical people, and just run-of-the mill lunatics demonstrated by the approval of the assassination but slander against Kirk and the stated desire that he would not be the only one to die. The intensity of violence seemed most focused on sexual perversion, though the same charges brought against the president and others were also in the mix. Many with a moral compass pushed back and called out the utter evil they read. 

That said, Kirk was not always nuanced enough in what he said, especially on racial division, which made for some unflattering sound bites. Truth has to be told without watering it down, but there are ways to say things. We have had a ministry for 40 years with the purpose of bringing people together regardless of race, ethnicity, income, education, or religious denomination. We have an inter-racial marriage with eight other cross-ethnic marriages in our extended family, so we try to be careful in all we say, because there are a lot of hot buttons that can be pushed unintentionally. One of his quotes calling MLK an awful person was one the left loves to use. It is an established fact from MLK's own writings on display at the King Center at Stanford University that he did not believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ from the age of 13, and was never known to have preached a Biblical gospel message. He was far more comfortable with Ghandi. Yes, it is awful for anyone with those proclivities, as well as very low moral character, as testified to by those closest to him, to present oneself as a Christian. Yet, all people talk about are words charged with emotion, while they themselves practically deify a man. Those in Christ cannot mirror the way the world deals with issues - we must be far better,

I have been to the King Center in Memphis, and it was pervaded by the blatantly racist BLM movement, but that was not in existence when MLK was alive, and it violates perhaps the best thing he ever said - judge a man NOT based upon the color of one's skin, but on the content of one's character. That has been largely lost on most college campuses today.   There is also the truth that blacks made more progress in the 50's than after the Civil Rights Act, though I believe the problems in the 60's had more to do with Lyndon Johnson's policies incentivising the removal of fathers from black homes as well as tone-deaf policies on crime, which dampened any positive effect of that act. I am sure Kirk was opposed to the expansion of that to include protected classes of people based upon morality/immorality rather than race, as well as the tone deafness of the left in terms of biological men invading women's sports and private spaces. He doubtless opposed the expansion of an act to deal with racial fairness to protect those with a stated agenda of destroying moral boundaries. It is always hard to give a qualified answer as people like sound bites, not reasoning, but those following him need to be sure never to hurt by not being crystal clear.

In addition, note that the breakdown of the family crosses racial lines. According to this source, https://theblackwallsttimes.com/2017/07/20/black-family-structure-in-decline-since-the-1960s-the-home-effect/, from 1960 to 2013, children in white single-parent families tripled from 7% to 22%, while children in single-parent black families went from 22% to 55%, a smaller rate of increase actually, but   2 1/2 times as often. I am positive the numbers have risen in both groups since then, as traditional nuclear families are a real minority across the board.

It is FORBES, not Kirk, that documented the situation of low black home ownership, which doubtless has been impacted by the destruction of so many black families by policies of Democrat presidents over the years. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnwake/2019/05/16/the-shocking-truth-about-the-u-s-black-homeownership-rate-50-years-after-the-1968-fair-housing-act/

While I wish some of the quotes out there attributed to Kirk were made up, many were not - I do not believe they were intended to hurt, but we must all be wise in what we say and how we say it. The truth often hurts, and Jesus was for sure not politically correct, but straight to the point, but to whatever degree we can bring hope and healing, we should.

TEACHER QUALIFICATION TEST

I received a perfect 34 out of 34 on this test. While I taught math many years ago, I am not currently a teacher, but from what I have observed, many teachers would not do well on this test based on things they post online.  Why not take it yourself?

 

MINNESOTA KILLINGS

So many were horrified about a man impersonating a police officer and shooting four people in Minnesota, two of whom were political representatives and two of their spouses - two died and the other two may make it. The two representatives were on opposite sides of a political argument, so it is hard to determine what the political motivations may have been.

The president and all decent people have condemned the shootings, and this hatred must be dipped in the bid. We have seen multiple attempts to assassinate the President, doxxing of SCOTUS justices, and swatting people supporting the president, which is so dangerous. (This is calling 911 with a report of a non-existent emergency at the target person's address, resulting in a S.W.A.T. team or other aggressive action endangering lives.)  This is typically met with a yawn and a who cares from the left.  

Also silent are those who seek to sanitize and actually CELEBRATE Planned Parenthood and similar abortion mills, whose death march on innocent babes in the womb comes to a number of 50 thousand youth sports teams a year!  That is 1,000 youth teams of 10 each for each state!   If you don't care for sports, is is almost the same as 1,000 super-jumbo jets crashing and killing all aboard every year ( and if any survive, killing them after the crash as often happens to survivors of abortions).  Could you imagine shooting the man on that Air India flight who survived after jumping out of the plane?   It is all insanity.

We condemn violence of all kinds, and to come together as a nation, we need to not exclude those we do not agree with, those who still in a supposedly safe space (their own mother's womb), and those we simply do not care about. We are waiting for the partiality and irrational disconnects to end so the atrocities will grind to a halt.