NAIVE CONSERVATIVE VOTERS

So many voters who are strong on moral issues are hopelessly naive when it comes to voting. Most will vote for president, a group in Pennsyvania notwithstanding who urges Christians not to vote, arguing all are corrupt, using false equivalencies.   If those in the early church coud vote, I believe they would have voted overwhelmingly against Nero, even if his opponent was quite far from perfect, but who at least looked out for them and chose people who were not overtly hostile to them.

This year, a woman who championed unrestrained access to ALL public school classrooms by the LGBTQetc folks with NO parental opt-out provision was elected governor of New Jersey ith only 12% of the vote and about 20% total turnout!  A decent opponent who was far more qualified but the victim of an absurdly dishonest hevaily financed campaign lost because so many stayed home. 

The existing Democratic AG, Matt Platkin, has been on a crusade against First Choice, a pregnancy center with a great record, doing a targeted and unconstitutional investigation making demands intended to destabilize them financially while of course leaving Planned Parenthood with endless admissions of illegal and immoral activity totally free to pursue their agenda.  Thankfully, the SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, but even if they win, time and resources are spent and those who could have brought about a change in leadership in New Jersey and the dastardly appointments they make.

This scenario has played out nationwide, especially in off-year elections. Radicals and leftist vote and often win, even in deep red areas because naive and clueless voters sit home. The result? Leftist and immoral school boards nationwide. Local leaders who rise up to higher positions. And the worst, perhaps? Mamdani, a communist Jew-hating man quite in tune wirth Hamas won the mayoralty race in New York City - while the turnout in NYC was over double percentage -wise that of NJ, he could EASILY Have been defeated if (1) a decent alternative candidate had been chosen, and (2) those who understood the evil would have gone to the polls.

Apathy ruled. Too many listened to bogus charges againt opponents or failed to weigh the differences between deeply flawed candidates.  When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?