EVEN NON-OILY DEMONCRATS ARE EXTREME HYPOCRITES

MICHAEL GARRETT is a Demoncrat Senator in North Carolina.  Seems like a loving family man, but like just about all Democrats, John Fetterman excluded, is a like a broken record, lying through his teeth and a total hypocrite.

His alleged trigger was the President's comment when Robert Mueller died, though he totally ignores that about 58% of Dems, in one poll, would be fine with DJT being assassinated.  They made a movie about assassinating George W. Bush.  They celebrated Charlie Kirk's death all over X and in public.  I would have said something more like - "Robert Mueller has passed away. He was a tool of some very evil people who caused great harm to my first term as president based upon lies, extreme dishonesty, and treachery by the Democratic Party, but I sympathize with his family as we are all in the same human condition and it is always difficult to deal with the loss of someone you love. On 48 occasions during his testimony regarding Russian election interference, the former special counsel seemed "confused," "uncertain," and "forgetful" and asked to have questions repeated, so  I lay the larger blame on those who used him against me."    Which is worse - some words that if YOU were in that situation, you may have said yourself, or wishing people with an "R" after their name would be killed?  It is obvious. The hypocrisy is seemingly endless, and the Dems possess it in spades.

He criticizes Trump for not serving in the military. The majority of men and women have not. Obama sure did not and undermined our nation every chance he got, and Clinton avoided the draft, but alas, "crickets".

The bigger problem is the non-stop hate against a man who has done much good for the country despite the endless lies. BHO deported 3x as many people with ZERO opposition and no stand-down orders to the police. I never heard Garrett ever praise the President for lowering taxes for the working citizens, especially seniors, by reducing their taxes on their social security income, which they need to supplement by working longer. I never heard him address the insurrection and the history of the two who died in Minnesota, with endless lies told defending their actions instead of the naked truth.

The Dems he is bed with want ZERO enforcement by ICE and are inconveniencing millions at airports over it. Dems lost the election, but arcane rules and some gutless folks in the GOP are responsible for the mess. 

He has no harsh words for Carter, who started the mess with Iran 47 years ago by undermining their legal leader and bringing untold suffering to Jews and others by the world’s primary sponsor of terrorism. His party opposed actions that many Arab neighbors support, while his bud BHO stood down when Iran had a chance at freedom during his reign - he was the "king" with the "phone and a pen" lingo.  Crickets.

The same BHO through David Axelrod undermined the elections in Nigeria, resulting in a Muslim leader and thousands of Christians and non-violent Muslims dead. BHJP was behind the same treachery in Israel, trying to get Netanyahu out. If he had succeeded, there would likely be no Israel today.  Clinton and the absurd Ehud Barak offered an absurd deal had prior offered the Palestinians an absurdly unfair deal to Israel which Arafat still refused. Clinton was selling out Israel.  Crickets.

Despite every country in Europe, South America, and Africa, as well as India, having Voter ID and citizenship requirements, his political family staunchly opposes common-sense election integrity efforts and perpetuates the bald-faced lies told by his party. Other countries managed it, even India with four times our population, but the Dems like sick Gavin Newsom and other sycophants are absurd and racially insulting.   Dems aren’t the only fraudsters - those exist worldwide. The world has been doing something about it, but Mr. Garrett denies what most people know, and polls show that about 85% of the country wants fair elections. 

The Prez wants to free the Cuban people, but the Dems do not support what every American used to want, including JFK, before the Dems went totally berserk. It is the sad truth - some people are about power and extracting every last cent out of the American people to waste money, profit themselves, and never accomplish anything of real value.

All these offenses are worse than a frustrated epithet, but TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) causes partiality to take center stage, and the pandemic is fueled by the pathetic liars at CNN, MSNOW, Jimmy Kimmel, and many more to the detriment of truth and our nation.

I am a political independent, and am distressed that the GOP seems more interested in raising money just like their counterparts rather than buying national ad campaigns to educate the tens of millions of very low information voters we are plagued with who eat the refuse spewed out by most of the media. Looking objectively at the facts, the current President has done more to strengthen our nation than Carter, Clinton, Obama, and Biden combined, and has not repeated their countless blunders, instead trying to clean up major messes they left due to either incompetence or horrific policy decisions.  It is critical to increase the GOP majorities this fall, not with RINO's, but with people of character who understand the issues and not those who sit back as the Grand Old Party and who feel good losing.  The campaign promise the Dems have made is to immediately impeach the successful president if they win.  That shows you why I call these irrational people DEMONCRATS.

QUOTE

The higher we soar, the smaller we appear to those who cannot fly.

     (Nietzsche) - not a fan of his, but this one works...

SOTU 2026

The GOP sent me a questionnaire about the State of the Union Address. It was very shallow, but I volunteeered the following to them:

While the "red meat" parts of the Prez' speech would appeal to many in the GOP who already are solidly in his corner, though probably not the Susan Collins RINO types, I believe the tone could have been much better and more statesmanlike, especially in the last portion, and especially for Independents and Fetterman Democrats, where he needs to stabilize support. I am an Independent who supports the President, but in talking to others who had voted for him before, I hear regret and criticism, which I think would not be there due to policies, but rather tone. Speaking of tone, Israel sure had a tough time with its prophets who tended to be blunt and as about politically incorrect as one could be. 

 

When the Dems sat during honoring heroic and human interest presentations, since Trump used to be a

Democrat and their darling, if in his shoes, I would have said something along the lines of:

 

"Back when I was a Democrat, the parties still had different ideas, but could come together on common interests. I saw that disappear and switched parties. Now you are witnessing that anything I say, they say the opposite. It is no longer arguing the details back and forth. You know that Abigail Spanberger (the very same one they picked to give an opposing speech after mine, which means they approve of and LOVE her approach) won based on a more moderate approach to the voters, knowing they would reject her had she been honest, but she shifted back into the rigid left-wing policies at warp speed immediately after taking office like others who play the same tired "Lucy and the Football" nonsense. DO not be another Charlie Brown. Take note of all those sitting today when decent Americans of BOTH Parties at home would be standing, and ask yourselves whether you would be among those who have stood for heroes and people who overcame so much. I am sure the answer is yes for most of you, my fellow Americans. Since these people sitting in front of you in plain sight are your representatives, they are not representing you in terms of basic human decency and values, and they have proudly shown themselves to you without me even having to tell you.  You have eyes. If you want to see more representatives stand for what you stand for at my next State of the Union Address in 2027, you need to replace the disrespectful sitters this November with people who will stand for what you would automatically stand for, and ask them to vote for legislation such as the SAVE Act, which is supported by over 80% of  Americans including a majority of Democrats but which not one of the House Congressional sitters would support. These folks want your vote, but want you to set aside your common sense, everything you learn at church or synagogue, and everything you talk about around your dinner table. I want your support for good people who WILL reinforce what you learn at your place of worship and are talking about around your own dinner table. If you simply stay home or pull the big Blue Lever out of habit without thinking about it, they will surely be emboldened to go even further in destroying American culture and greatness, repeat the chaos they engaged in before, and turn us into a backwater country unworthy of any honor or leadership in the world."

 

This would not have taken any longer than repeating the insult-jabs, which unfortunately has made  even reasonably conservative people who support the same policies a bit apprehensive. I look beyond those, and put policies above a strong personality that some do not like, and encourage others to as well, but the Prez could have made our defense of him a whole lot easier. People need to remember that without a strong in-your-face personality, conservatives have gotten rolled for years. Join me in praying for the president that he would know Christ, have a blessed marriage and know how to navigate leading a very divided nation.

 

FORGET THE SUPER BOWL

The prez isn't the only one skipping the Super Bowl. I have no plans to touch the unclean thing. Do you?Bad Bunny and Green Day?  Seriously? Bad Bunny plans to wear a DRESS to support sexual perversion.

Not sure how much longer God will withhold his judgment, but the NFL has lost its way totally with inane messaging and supporting everything God hates. For years now, their half-time shows have been open sewers.  I just turned them off.  Now is the time to make this the lowest-rated Super Bowl in memory.

Americans need to simply vote with their remote. The sickos at the NFL will only listen if the money faucet dries up.

We are tired of the Dan Cathy's of the world compromising good companies and institutions (in his case Chick-fil-A) before the Baals of this world. If we do not stand now, WHEN? Can I get an "Amen?"

THE REAL BIG 2020 ELECTION LIE

 I was ordering a cheesesteak hoagie today and they had FOX on with the hearing with Jack Smith, and an angry Democrat, Ms. Kamlager-Dove (isn't it always the hyphenated ones?) kept declaring that the claim that the 2020 election was stolen was a big lie - again, and again, and again.  "Thou dost protest too much."  Lies stated often enough become the truth to those unable to critically think or to recognize the obvious.  The Dems and RINOs call it a lie ad infinitum because people still know in their gut that the election was indeed corrupt and almost certainly stolen, and they want to bombard and intimidate until their opposition is totally marginalized. 

The so-called origins science folks have done that with molecules-to-man evolution - they really do not care if anyone understands the hypothesis, they are simply satisfied when someone agrees to it being true. They roundly ignore all the issues with the hypothesis, including the fact that the human race would genetically become extinct within 500 generations, given the 100 changes per generation. The Bible puts the number at 200-300 generations so far and counting, while the 2.5-million-year human timeline by evolutionists would require close to 125,000 generations. They try to save their theory by saying genetic change did not occur until about 5,100 years ago, which much better aligns with human history. I have seen the graph, and all this is only one scintilla of all the evidence that works against the hypothesis (how did gender, sexuality, information, and optimally designed components with inate reproductive capabilities all arise in just the right placeswith just the right timing, and how, how, how?) Trump says he has come across massive evidence concerning the election to bolster his claims. Hopefully, enough remains that did not go the way of Hillary's emails to make his case. We need to see it. I have seen a lot, but I am sure there is much more. 

I reviewed detailed analyses by some very technical people, and I am personally positive that the election was indeed stolen. Any other explanation for the data defies reality and is suitable only for the most gullible. RINOs and Mike Pence, who were not fond of Trump, made pronouncements mimicking Dems with no evidence whatsoever. What Trump asked Pence to do was wholly legal and justified.

Of course, there are always those who bombastically claim otherwise, but I have seen zero evidence to back up their hyperbolic claims.  Here are just a few pieces of evidence:

1) The number of registered voters increased by 19% from 2008 to 2020. Yet Biden allegedly outperformed Barack Obama by 23% in terms of vote totals.  That 4% is quite telling in elections typically only won by half that margin. Joe Biden stayed in his basement, so to speak, while Obama drew large adoring crowds like Trump did twelve years later. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it almost always IS a duck!

2) Swing states illegally changed voting procedures using Covid as the all-encompassing excuse. Massive mail-in voting was allowed, which, by the way, was largely eliminated in Europe due to easy and pervasive fraud. U.S. Dems are not the only ones who cheat, but they have a near-monopoly on it here. Mass dumps into ballot boxes have been video-documented, and yet the over-confident Kamlager-Dove, immune to the obvious, soldiers on.  They also allowed votes to be counted past the deadlines - remember back in 1960 with Mayor Daley in Chicago, who famously asked, "How many more votes do we need?" I am aware of the largely uncontested analysis of how the late proven fraud in Illinois resulted in JFK rather than Nixon winning that state, but it was not enough to turn the national results. Seven swing states all magically ended up in the Biden column in 2020 by "just enough to win" margins, while all seven went to Trump in 2024, which defies even a fertile imagination.

3) Consistent 51-49 results including voting district tallies totally inconsistent with previous elections and 2024.  "Just enough to win." Counties that went for Trump in 2016 magically going for Biden like crazy.  Then in 2024, the results tracked back to agree with historical records. Amazing!

4) Vote counting halted in swing states with excuses to get rid of poll watchers. HVAC, plumbing leaks, and what not. I do not believe in multiple coincidences the SAME DAY. Do you?

5) Illegal counting by others through the night with massive ballot drops from insecure locations amazingly all for one candidate, some with repeatedly the same signatures. In Georgia, the person in charge quashed all opposition to what went on. That is on video and there is no alternative explanation for what happened.

6) Voting machines that "could not process" hundreds of times more votes that the established accuracy standard were then manually processed with one-sided results every time. In Georgia, those went over 95% for Biden in districts not given to that. Reminds me of Philly where John Kerry got 100% of the vote in some voting districts where opposition poll watchers were kicked out.

7) Biden barely campaigned, seemingly sure he was going to win (the fix was in). His strategy was not to go out there and stumble more than he had already.  We all saw the real Joe Biden in that pivotal debate in 2024. Stumbling was his way of life.

8) Court cases were dismissed based upon "lack of standing" which often seems misapplied when a court does not want to take up a case. NOT ONE to my knowledge ever dealt with any technical analysis.

9) Dominion rolled Fox for their claims on their involvement - yet the Venezuelan connection with Dominion and the way the machines were set in terms of rejections appears beyond anything accidental.

10) Alarmingly similar installment of the loser in both Brazil and Venezuela with a similar m.o.  New evidence on international players, including China, appear to have substantial evidence, but anyone interested in truth would desire we know for sure what happened so it never happens again.

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DAY

Over 40 years ago, back in 1985, my wife and I started a non-profit dedicated to breaking down barriers among people - racial, economic, educational, denominational, political, etc. This ministry is totally non-denominational and has published a lot of gospel literature and produced over 3,000 radio programs.  We have a black-white marriage, and there have actually been NINE interethnic marriages in our extended family - black, white, bi-racial, Hispanic, Asian, you name it.

Due to my passion for true unity, I was often the designated speaker at church on MLK Day. I honestly would have preferred it to have been called Civil Rights Day, as that is the nature of most Federal Holidays. Even George Washington, the Founder of our nation, and Abraham Lincoln, the one who preserved the Union, do not have a day with their name on it - only "Presidents Day".   Even Christmas and Easter are not named after the Lord who left heaven to come die for us and be raised up, do not accord that honor.  Only Columbus Day, which dates back to 1792, and MLK, Jr. Day remain.  Even then, only 20 states make Columbus Day a paid holiday, and many insist on trashing Columbus Day and celebrating Indigenous Peoples Day instead.  There is a lot of P.C. behind this, as well as a total glorification of those called Native Americans, often ignoring actual history, which indicates that they are no more sainted than any other people group. There was some pretty intense violence, massive intertribal warfare, and the like, flying in the face of the peace-pipe images.  I have nothing against honoring them as much as any other people group, as ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God. However, to demonize Columbus and deify Native Americans is simply a non-starter for me.

The move a few decades ago to practically deify MLK led me to stop doing those speeches.  For the last few, I only talked about civil rights and barely mentioned his name. However, pushing him to sainthood despite the increasing hard evidence he was not a saint at all, from the Testimony of Ralph Abernathy, his successor of the SCLC, confessions of others close to him, the note from Boston University concerning his doctorate degree at the King Center at Stanford University, which should have been revoked for gross and massive plagiarism. They asked what purpose that would serve, ignoring academic integrity. The evidence of chronic plagiarism throughout his life including the "I Have A Dream" speech came to light when his papers were donated by Coretta to Stanford in the 1980's. Perhaps he felt privileged as predominantly white Crozer Theological Seminary gave him an A- average while predominantly black Morehouse College gave him a C+.  Boston University continued the favored treatment.

Perhaps even more alarming to Christians was his extreme serial adultery, even on the day of his death. Women at his speeches would give him their number or a key to his room, and his confidantes said he did not refuse any. Ralph Abernathy and others confirmed the extent of unfaithfulness and it was alleged Coretta simply looked the other way.

I have been to the King Center in Memphis, but have studied documents from Stanford. It has always bothered me that Christian evangelicals often call him a prophet, though originally they opposed him. With the rise of Malcolm X, he seemed more palatable, so it was Christian P.C. to embrace him as a fellow believer with a call on his life. However, any honest reading of his academic papers indicates he was never born again, and in fact was an enemy of the true gospel, never having preached it his entire life.  He says he was baptized at six but had no clue what it was about, simply joining others. He became a skeptic as a child, and by the age of 13, determined that Jesus Christ was not God.  Any "divinity" was simply because Jesus was doing God's work. The virgin birth and much of scripture were not in his belief system at all, and the entirety of his theological education was at apostate institutions. He leaned on theologians who denied the central beliefs of Christianity, and seemed to have never seriously studied scripture, but cherry-picked passages that were consistent with his message and interpreted them to suit his agenda. Of course, that is called eisegesis, and he is far from alone in doing that. Whether the purveyors of health and wealth on TBN and similar networks, those pushing feminism, or liberation theologians in Nicaragua and elsewhere, eisegesis is a sure-fire path to deception. Only exegesis, which seeks to take from scripture the pure, obvious, and eternal meaning, will keep one on the straight and narrow path to eternal life.  I Peter 2 warns us about people who appeal to Christians, but who have an immoral character and other issues that we need to avoid.

I find that those who are partial, who look past the sins of those they admire, fall into manifest deceptions. That is so common today among so many that millions honor and respect, and MLK is not the slightest unique in that. The reason we point out the specifics today, though, is that we have a Federal holiday that honors him above all others, even those whose character dwarfs his. To be impartial is more than a notion, and we need to be 100% consistent in that if we are to please the Lord.

NAIVE CONSERVATIVE VOTERS

So many voters who are strong on moral issues are hopelessly naive when it comes to voting. Most will vote for president, a group in Pennsylvania notwithstanding, which urges Christians not to vote, arguing all are corrupt, using false equivalencies.   If those in the early church could vote, I believe they would have voted overwhelmingly against Nero, even if his opponent was quite far from perfect, but who at least looked out for them and chose people who were not overtly hostile to them.

This year, a woman who championed unrestrained access to ALL public school classrooms by the LGBTQetc folks with NO parental opt-out provision was elected governor of New Jersey with only 12% of the vote and about 20% total turnout!  A decent opponent who was far more qualified but the victim of an absurdly dishonest heavily financed campaign lost because so many stayed home. 

The existing Democratic AG, Matt Platkin, has been on a crusade against First Choice, a pregnancy center with a great record, doing a targeted and unconstitutional investigation making demands intended to destabilize them financially while of course leaving Planned Parenthood with endless admissions of illegal and immoral activity totally free to pursue their agenda.  Thankfully, the SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, but even if they win, time and resources are spent and those who could have brought about a change in leadership in New Jersey and the dastardly appointments they make.

This scenario has played out nationwide, especially in off-year elections. Radicals and leftist vote and often win, even in deep red areas, because naive and clueless voters sit home. The result? Leftist and immoral school boards nationwide. Local leaders who rise up to higher positions. And the worst, perhaps? Mamdani, a communist Jew-hating man quite in tune with Hamas won the mayoralty race in New York City - while the turnout in NYC was over double percentage -wise that of NJ, he could EASILY have been defeated if (1) a decent alternative candidate had been chosen, and (2) those who understood the evil would have gone to the polls.

Apathy ruled. Too many listened to bogus charges against opponents or failed to weigh the differences between deeply flawed candidates.  When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?